How to reach the maintainer.
HeardTogether has no mailing list, no comment form, no notification system. Direct correspondence is the only channel. The maintainer is one person; replies are not guaranteed; the only things that change the site are corrections backed by a primary source.
Corrections
If something on the site is factually wrong, write to the maintainer and include:
- The page URL and the specific sentence that’s wrong.
- The correct fact.
- A link to the primary source that establishes the correct fact (a council PDF, a court filing, an on-the-record quote, a published transcript).
Corrections backed by a primary source are processed promptly. Corrections without a source are not.
Primary-source submissions
If you have a document that belongs in one of the case files — a Lavon council packet that hasn’t been mirrored, a public-records response, a model transcript that would extend the Ghost Pattern Library — send it with the chain of custody. The maintainer will:
- Cache the original to disk (so the citation chain survives future deletions);
- Update the relevant case file with a citation that points to the original source and to the local mirror;
- Credit the submitter only if explicitly requested in writing.
What will not be answered
- Requests for political endorsement, candidate evaluation, or campaign material.
- Requests to remove publicly-recorded statements by public officials acting in their public capacity.
- Requests for inclusion in exchange for payment, advertising, or other consideration.
- Requests for opinions on parties not named on this site.
- Anonymous tips that identify private individuals.
Where to write
For corrections and primary-source submissions, write to the maintainer directly. The page-specific contact addresses on each case file (e.g., the “Lavon corrections” line in the Lavon About page) route to the same person.
A public email address will be added here once the site has a stable home. Until then, corrections should be addressed via the channel through which you discovered the site.
For journalists
Material on this site is fair game for reporting. Citations to primary sources are intended exactly so a reporter can re-pull the documents independently. If a quote is useful, the maintainer asks (but does not require) that the source PDF be quoted alongside, so the chain stays intact downstream.
The maintainer does not give on-the-record interviews about the site itself. The site speaks for itself; adding a personality layer to it would defeat the point.